archi_clean
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
date_start: '22-03-2019 16:06'
|
||||
date_end: '03-05-2019 16:07'
|
||||
lieux: '12th Floor'
|
||||
title: Cicatrices
|
||||
media_order: 'Adriano Amaral, Untitled, 2018.jpg,Adriano Amaral, Untitled, 2018(1).jpg,Adriano Amaral, Untitled, 2018(2).jpg,Cajsa von Zeipel, When_ and Why_, 2019.jpg,Cajsa von Zeipel, Why_, 2019, When_, 2019.jpg,Details of Adriano Amaral, Untitled, 2018.jpg,Details of Cajsa von Zeipel, When_ and Why_, 2019.jpg,Installation Isaac Lythgoe and Muriel Abadie.jpg,Isaac Lythgoe, grip the wheel, look straight ahead, 2016.jpg,Jean-Marie Appriou, Shrimp, 2018.jpg,John Miserendino, L’origine du monde, 2018.jpg,John Miserendino, Mamie and Marco, 2018.jpg,Muriel Abadie, Masked Monkey, 2018.jpg'
|
||||
show_sidebar: false
|
||||
aura:
|
||||
pagetype: website
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
On an epithelial level, the scar is simply a mark, a regenerated piece of tissue, a healed lesion
|
||||
that conventionally follows the infliction of an incision or a burn, either intentional or not. Of
|
||||
this trace however, we almost instantly find that it does not suffice to regard it as a mere
|
||||
peculiarity of the dermis, as what is crucial to this fibrous section of tissue is the meta-
|
||||
cutaneous, its metonymic relationship to a particular event or action. This is the primary trait
|
||||
of any scar: that it signifies beyond the skin, beyond the biological palimpsest that it has
|
||||
produced. We are, at first, tempted to associate it with the traumatic, with the remnants of
|
||||
suffering that make of it a relic of pain, both physical and cognitive, an agonizing recollection
|
||||
of consumed passions and jagged embraces, flaming within our psyche and manifest with the
|
||||
illuminated perspex sculptures of Isaac Lythgoe. Yet, is it not a scar that also reminds one of
|
||||
birth, of being removed from the womb for, which our mothers bear a caesarean section or
|
||||
we, a snipping away of the umbilical cord? Can the postpartum depression alluded to by
|
||||
Srijon Chowdhury’s distracted mother-infant dyad not foreshadow a latter maternal joy, an
|
||||
expulsion of postnatal morbidity?
|
||||
If we look past the mere a priori and posteriori of the scar we begin its exoneration, its
|
||||
acknowledgement as a mode of ‘becoming’ with aesthetic, religious, socio-cultural, and
|
||||
adaptive facets. The tattoo reaffirms this, for it not only physically exteriorises the intrinsic,
|
||||
symbolically branding the epidermis, but performs the function of ritual by subjecting one to
|
||||
the repeated injection of their beliefs. Such Maia Regis’ effaced protagonist, dog and pistol in
|
||||
hand, imparts further potency to its all too visceral surroundings via the snake emblem
|
||||
ascending their torso, the scar given agency. The kissing silicone sculptures of Casja von
|
||||
Zeipel too recall this piercing and tinting of the skin through selective transparencies and the
|
||||
emulation of a cracked reptilian dermis undergoing ecdysis (molting), further inscribing their
|
||||
hyper-visiblity by means of their hybridity. Synthetic and organic, their skin, double-layered or
|
||||
scaled, appears mechanically superior while still presenting the human characteristic of
|
||||
retaining traces, or bearing scars. This dualism, the recalling of an organic anterior, further
|
||||
prompt a focus on DNA, one expressed by Adriano Amaral in his employment of natural
|
||||
materials such as tree bark and spirulina alongside shapes of contemporary industry. The
|
||||
ramifications emerging from Amaral’s tubular structures delineate an ecological scarification
|
||||
inflicted upon flora and fauna rather than the human flesh, proposing the solution of
|
||||
prosthetics as a method of undoing any damage to the organic. A similar approach lies within
|
||||
Jean-Marie Appriou’s sculptures of marine creatures. Displaying a hereditary connection to
|
||||
their material makeup, for glass is made out of sand, such works however, conversely,
|
||||
emphasize their static adherence to the gallery wall rendering the objet d’art no different to a
|
||||
biological specimen. There is no question of hybridity as with Zeipel or Amaral, urging rather
|
||||
recognition through a confrontation with artifice.
|
||||
John Miserendino’s variegated marbles too evidentiate their flesh-like striations in order to
|
||||
uncover a particularity akin to DNA. Each marble is modeled after, yet not sculpted to
|
||||
resemble a figure, breaking with a tradition of purity (white-ness) and the relative anonymity
|
||||
of material by accentuating surface lesions and vivid chromatic schemes. The notions of
|
||||
transmission and trace exist not only within such marbles, for through the work of Muriel
|
||||
Abadie an idea of recollection, of one's personal rather than cultural history surfaces with
|
||||
the sketch. Abadie seeks to access a realm of the familiar, to awaken in all of us a forgotten
|
||||
memory that can appear through the visual. Her urge is collective, remembrance as
|
||||
protection against temporal perdition. Within our efforts to heal, perhaps the same can be
|
||||
said for the cicatrice...
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user